{"id":2124,"date":"2009-12-17T10:01:46","date_gmt":"2009-12-17T14:01:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.schollnick.net\/wordpress\/?p=2124"},"modified":"2012-04-21T23:03:40","modified_gmt":"2012-04-22T03:03:40","slug":"2413u-dual-band-powerlinc-wrf","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.schollnick.net\/wordpress\/2009\/12\/2413u-dual-band-powerlinc-wrf\/","title":{"rendered":"2413U?  Dual Band?  Powerlinc w\/RF&#8230;."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In a discussion on the 2413U, in the Perceptive Automation forums, Indigo&#8217;s Author (Matt Bendiksen), has indicated that he believes that the 2413U does indeed save an &#8220;hop&#8221; on the Powerline network, and &#8220;is even faster than the 2412U in some cases&#8221;. Of course, he did include the obligatory Smiley with the note.<\/p>\n<p>But this makes sense, currently the 2414U &amp; 2412U transmissions look something like this:<\/p>\n<p>Hop 0: Computer sends signal to controller<br \/>\nHop 1: Controller sends signal to PowerLine network<br \/>\nHop 2: Access point receives signal, and retransmits it to other Access points<br \/>\nHop 2.5: Other Access points receive signal and retransmit the signal in their regions.<\/p>\n<p>Now, with the 2413U, it is suggested that the flow would be something more like:<\/p>\n<p>Hop 0: Computer sends signal to controller<br \/>\nHop 1: Controller sends signal to PowerLine network &amp; RF Network<br \/>\nHop 1.5: Access points receive signal and retransmit the signal in their regions.<\/p>\n<p>Yes, Hop 1&#8217;s powerline transmission maybe enough for the signal to trigger the unit&#8230; But the RF transmission still occurs..<\/p>\n<p>Also, think about RF devices sending insteon signals:<\/p>\n<p>Step 0: TriggerLinc sends signal<br \/>\nStep 1: Access point receives signal<br \/>\nStep 1.5: RF Signal is boosted, and retransmitted (for other Access points)<br \/>\nStep 2: Access Points retransmit the signal, on the powerline<br \/>\nStep 3: Controller receives the signal<\/p>\n<p>Now with the 2413U, I suspect it would be closer to this:<\/p>\n<p>Step 0: TriggerLinc sends signal<br \/>\nStep 1: Controller receives signal \/\/ Other Access points receives signal<br \/>\nStep 1.5: RF Signal is boosted, and retransmitted (for other Access points)<br \/>\nStep 2: Access Points retransmit the signal, on the powerline<\/p>\n<p>Yes, the other steps occur, in case there is another device linked to the wireless device, but the point is that the controller will have the signal at Step 1 or Step 1.5. Whereas the 2414U, or 2412U would need until step 3 to receive the signal.<\/p>\n<p>These Dual Band units will be a boon to Insteon &amp; Home Automation assuming that they live up to their potential.<\/p>\n<p>I expect to be receiving my 2413U around Christmas&#8230; So expect to see a review around then&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In a discussion on the 2413U, in the Perceptive Automation forums, Indigo&#8217;s Author (Matt Bendiksen), has indicated that he believes that the 2413U does indeed save an &#8220;hop&#8221; on the Powerline network, and &#8220;is even faster than the 2412U in some cases&#8221;. Of course, he did include the obligatory Smiley with the note. But this <a class=\"read-more\" href=\"http:\/\/www.schollnick.net\/wordpress\/2009\/12\/2413u-dual-band-powerlinc-wrf\/\">[&hellip;]<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0},"categories":[68,4],"tags":[71,97],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.schollnick.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2124"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.schollnick.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.schollnick.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.schollnick.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.schollnick.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2124"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.schollnick.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2124\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.schollnick.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2124"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.schollnick.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2124"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.schollnick.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2124"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The constant WPCACHEHOME must be set in the file wp-config.php and point at the WP Super Cache plugin directory. -->