Google pulled an app from the Android marketplace that was created to illustrate a flaw in the mobile framework that allowed apps to be installed without a user’s knowledge. It then issued a fix for bug.

Jon Oberheide, chief technology officer of Scio Security, created a proof-of-concept app disguised as an expansion for the popular Angry Birds game. After the app was downloaded, three additional apps were installed without the user’s knowledge that had permission to perform malicious activities but were benign, he told CNET in an interview.

Oberheide and Zach Lanier, a senior consultant at Intrepidus Group, were scheduled to present their research on the Android vulnerability at Intel’s annual internal security conference in Hillsboro, Ore., today.

Before they got a chance to give their presentation, Google pulled the app, according to Oberheide. The company also began rolling out a fix for the issue, which applies to all Android devices, a Google spokesperson said in an e-mail late yesterday.

Read more about it here –  Google pulls app that revealed Android flaw, issues fix

 

So the government, is asking for bids, from multiple vendors for a product that can only be created by one vendor.  So if anyone else wants to win the bid, they have to purchase services / product from Microsoft.  Yes indeed.  This is your money at work, within the government.  Especially since there are tons of alternatives out there, from Google Apps / Docs, to Zimbra…

In its Request for Quotes RFQ, a document asking companies to design a solution and quote the department a price, the DOI restricted the candidates to using the Microsoft suite only. The problem is that such a restriction is akin to putting money directly in Microsofts pocket, as the contract cant be completed without Microsoft taking part at some point.

According to the lawsuit Google filed, the DOI tried to justify the requirement by saying its suite offered consolidated e-mail and “enhanced security.” The 37-page filing details several volleys between Google and the DOI, wherein Google points out that Microsoft products still have downtime issues and makes a case for its own Google Apps as a suitable alternative.

Read the full article at Google sues feds over Microsoft-centric bidding requirement.

 

iFixit has torn apart a Google TV Revue, and discovered a few things…  I’ll summarize, but please go to First Google TV Teardown for the full details…

  • 1.2 Ghz ATOM processor
  • 1 GB DDR3 RAM
  • 5 Gb of NAND (Flash) memory for storage

So not a remarkable machine for $400-500, plus accessories….

 

Surprise, Suprise, Suprise…

Evidently ABC, NBC and CBS appear to be blocking Google TV from accessing the TV shows on their own sites…. And Ars Technica looks at the background of this…

Not so shocking: TV networks block Google TV.

Custom Search

 

Normally we use the built-in search engine for WordPress, but the Google Search engine is more robust, offers more features, and is quite frankly more powerful.

Here’s your simple connection to Google.  Type your search request in the box, and Google will reply back with the search results….

 

Folks,

My apologies, I didn’t realize that the RSS Floater had been turned on in the Share and Follow plugin.  I just turned it off, I find those gimmicks to be way too annoying…  (This from someone that tries to follow several hundred RSS feeds, thanks Google Reader!).

 

Internet TV is threatening to turn cable TV’s subscription model on its head with on demand programming and rentals, but there is a key component that’s missing: content discovery. There is still no better way to find out what’s on than to flip through channels.

Apple TV, the Boxee Box, Google TV, Hulu, Roku, and a sundry of desktop (and now mobile) applications comprise a compelling alternative to traditional cable TV service. My colleague Harry McCracken has them all pretty well covered.

I know many people who have “unplugged” themselves from the shackles of costly year-long contracts. Why pay for channels that you don’t watch? Those people are typically more technically savvy than most of the population. I just recently upgraded my mother’s 1980s big screen TV to an HDTV.

My mother and I find what’s on TV in much the same way: we channel surf or use a “guide.” There are more than a few shows that drew me in by happenstance. AMC’s “Breaking Bad” is my favorite “accident.” Internet TV is surfing with a net, keeping us in the familiar, and not venturing out into the unexplored.

That’s from David Worthington from the Technologizer.

Here’s a crazy idea, talk to friends, talk to neighbors, go to TitanTV or the TV Guide web site…  All of these are neat ways to get ideas on what is on TV, and or to schedule your TV viewing.

Or check your daily newspaper, or subscribe to the Sunday newspaper, they both use to include (I assume they still do) TV listings for your area…

But, if you want to find accidential gems of TV shows.  I have two words.

YOU TUBE!

Go over to youtube, type the keyword “TV” and add a random word.  I guarantee you will find something to watch, and possibly find some interesting TV shows you would never watch normally…

Now the question changes, to are these shows still available.  Well…  That I can’t help with.  But if you want the ultimate in pain, then type in “Reality TV shows”.

 

Texting bans for drivers not putting a dent in accident rates from Ars Technica:

Study after study shows that distracted drivers are far more likely to get into accidents, which has led a number of states to craft laws intended to limit one of the most significant distractions: the cell phone. Initial efforts focused on keeping both hands on the wheel by mandating hands-free use, but more recent versions have cracked down on texting while driving. Now, a study of accident rates indicates that the bans may not be having the desired effect, as accident rates may actually be increasing in some states that have enacted them.

The study was done by the Highway Loss Data Institute, a nonprofit that is supported by auto insurers and has access to their data on accident claims. This isn’t the first time that the HLDI has waded into this territory; earlier this year, it performed an essentially identical study on accident rates that followed cell phone bans, and also concluded that the legislation had little effect. (Other studies indicate that there may be strong regional effects that are missed in statewide analyses.)

Here’s my view point.  It’s virtually impossible to enforce, after all, here in NY State it is also illegal to be on a cell phone without a handsfree device.  Does that stop anyone?  Not at all, I see plenty of people just talking away with their phones craddled inbetween their ear & shoulder while driving.

If the law is not enforceable, then don’t pass it.  There are already way too many non-enforceable  laws in place as is.  A 1% (a made up percentage!) enforcement rate doesn’t encourage other people toobey the law.  For anyone to be concerned about the law, they must know that they will be caught, or believe that it is likely that caught.

Marginal enforcement will not change people’s attitudes, all it does is act as a slight penalty, and give the state additional funding (via the fines).  It also allows the law to be used retroactively.  For example, someone was caught speeding, and the officer see’s the person on the phone without a handsfree device, or texting, he now has two charges instead of one.

via Google Reader (602).

© 2011 The Matrix Data BankSuffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha